Posts Tagged ‘AutomotiveSecurity’
[DefCon32] Autos, Alcohol, Blood, Sweat, & Creative Reversing Obfuscated Car Modding Tool
In the intricate world of reverse engineering, Atlas, a seasoned security researcher, unveils a captivating journey through the deobfuscation of an automotive modding tool. This software, capable of flashing firmware and tweaking vehicle engines, represents a complex challenge due to its heavily obfuscated code. Atlas’s narrative, rich with technical ingenuity, guides the audience through innovative approaches to unraveling hidden truths, empowering researchers with new methodologies and tools to tackle similar challenges.
Confronting Obfuscation Challenges
Atlas begins by describing the daunting nature of obfuscated code, which obscures functionality to thwart analysis. The automotive modding tool, a blend of machine code and proprietary logic, posed unique hurdles. By leveraging tools like Vivisect, Atlas meticulously dissected the binary, identifying key patterns such as virtual function tables. These tables, often marked by grouped function pointers, served as entry points to understand the code’s structure. His approach focused on analyzing the “this” pointer in 32-bit architectures, typically passed via the ECX register, to map out critical functions like destructors.
Crafting Custom Analysis Tools
To overcome the limitations of existing binary analysis tools, Atlas customized his toolkit, enhancing Vivisect to handle the tool’s unique obfuscation techniques. He explored cross-references to function pointers, uncovering embedded strings and objects. For instance, comparing register values like EDI against offsets revealed string manipulations, allowing Atlas to reconstruct the code’s intent. His creative modifications enabled dynamic analysis, transforming static binaries into actionable insights, a process he encourages others to replicate by adapting tools to specific needs.
Decoding the Automotive Modding Tool
The core of Atlas’s work centered on understanding the modding tool’s interaction with vehicle systems. By analyzing function calls and memory operations, he identified how the tool manipulated firmware to alter engine performance. His methodology involved tracing execution paths, spotting decrement and free operations, and reconstructing object hierarchies. This granular approach not only demystified the tool but also highlighted vulnerabilities in its design, offering lessons for securing automotive software against unauthorized modifications.
Empowering the Community
Atlas concludes with a call to action, urging researchers to think beyond conventional tools and embrace creative problem-solving. By sharing his customized Vivisect enhancements and methodologies, he aims to inspire others to tackle obfuscated code with confidence. His emphasis on understanding the “why” behind code behavior fosters a deeper appreciation for reverse engineering, equipping the community to uncover truths in complex systems.
Links:
- None
[DefCon32] The Hack, the Crash, and Two Smoking Barrels
The automotive industry’s rush to pack vehicles with connectivity exposes a glaring cybersecurity gap. Thomas Sermpinis, a security researcher at Upstream Security, navigates this “underworld” of car manufacturing, where tight deadlines and complacent engineering sideline security. His narrative, punctuated by real-world exploitations and a live ECU demo, exposes vulnerabilities in vehicle architectures and advocates for systemic change.
Thomas, leveraging his expertise in embedded systems, recounts discovering zero-day flaws and convincing skeptical engineers of their severity—sometimes by engaging brakes mid-drive. His stories highlight the tension between innovation and safety, contrasting mainstream manufacturers with a smaller OEM’s robust security design.
Automotive Architecture Vulnerabilities
Thomas outlines vehicle architectures, where ECUs (Electronic Control Units) manage critical functions like braking and steering. Legacy designs, reliant on CAN bus protocols, lack encryption, making them susceptible to injection attacks. He demonstrates exploiting a zero-day to manipulate an ECU, showcasing real-time risks like unauthorized control.
Mainstream OEMs, driven by cost, lag in adopting secure protocols like Automotive Ethernet, leaving vehicles exposed to remote attacks.
Engaging Engineers and Industry
A pivotal moment in Thomas’s journey involves a live demo, where an engineer experiences a brake lock triggered by a flaw. This visceral proof shifts perspectives, underscoring the need for security prioritization. He critiques the “good enough” mentality fueled by capitalism, where budgets trump safety.
His modular toolkit, Caribou Next, a fork of Caring Caribou, enables standardized attacks across vehicles, highlighting systemic weaknesses.
Lessons from a Secure OEM
Thomas contrasts mainstream failures with a small manufacturer, likely Tesla, whose IT-centric approach yields a centralized, secure architecture. By treating vehicles as software platforms, this OEM implements robust encryption and authentication, resisting common exploits.
This model, though not universal, offers a blueprint for industry-wide improvements, emphasizing proactive security integration.
Raising Awareness and Future Steps
Thomas urges collaboration between researchers, OEMs, and regulators to enforce security standards. Emerging technologies like secure CAN transceivers show promise, but adoption lags. His demos, shared responsibly, aim to spark interest in automotive hacking, driving awareness to protect lives.