Posts Tagged ‘GenAI’
[NDCOslo2024] The History of Computer Art – Anders Norås
In the incandescent interstice of innovation and imagination, where algorithms awaken aesthetics, Anders Norås, a Norwegian designer and digital dreamer, traces the tantalizing trajectory of computer-generated creativity. From 1960s Silicon Valley’s psychedelic pixels to 2020s generative galleries, Anders animates an anthology of artistic audacity, where hackers harnessed harmonics and hobbyists honed holograms. His odyssey, opulent with optical illusions and ontological inquiries, unveils code as canvas, querying: when does datum dance into divinity?
Anders ambles from Bay Area’s beatnik bytes—LSD-laced labs birthing bitmap beauties—to 1970s fine artists’ foray into fractals. Vera Molnar’s algorithmic abstractions, Molnar’s mechanical marks, meld math with muse, manifesting minimalism’s machine-made magic.
Psychedelic Pixels: 1960s’ Subcultural Sparks
San Francisco’s hacker havens hummed with hallucinatory hacks: Ken Knowlton’s BEFLIX begat filmic fractals, A. Michael Noll’s noisy nudes nodded to neo-classics. Anders accentuates the alchemy: computers as collaborators, conjuring compositions that captivated cognoscenti.
Algorithmic Abstractions: 1970s’ Fine Art Fusion
Fine artists forayed into flux: Frieder Nake’s generative geometries, Georg Nees’s nested nests—exhibitions eclipsed elites, etching electronics into etudes. Harold Cohen’s AARON, an autonomous auteur, authored arabesques, blurring brushes and binaries.
Rebellious Renderings: 1980s’ Demoscene Dynamism
Demoscene’s defiant demos dazzled: Future Crew’s trance tunnels, Razor 1911’s ray-traced reveries—amateurs authored epics on 8-bits, echoing graffiti’s guerrilla glee. Anders applauds the anarchy: code as contraband, creativity’s clandestine cabal.
Digital Diaspora: Internet’s Infinite Installations
Web’s weave widened worlds: JODI’s jetset glitches, Rafael Lozano-Hemmer’s responsive realms—browsers birthed boundless biennales. Printouts prized: AARON auctions at astronomic asks, affirming artifacts’ allure.
Generative Galas: GenAI’s Grand Gesture
Anders assays AI’s ascent: Midjourney’s mirages, DALL-E’s dreams—yet decries detachment, Dolly’s depthless depictions devoid of dialogue. Jeff Wall’s “A Sudden Gust of Wind” juxtaposed: human heft versus heuristic haze, where context conceals critique.
Anders’s axiom: art awakens awareness—ideas ignite, irrespective of instrument. His entreaty: etch eternally, hand hewn, honoring humanity’s hallowed hue.
Links:
[NDCOslo2024] Mirror, Mirror: LLMs and the Illusion of Humanity – Jodie Burchell
In the mesmerizing mirror maze of machine mimicry, where words weave worlds indistinguishable from wit, Jodie Burchell, JetBrains’ data science developer advocate, shatters the spell of sentience in large language models (LLMs). A PhD psychologist turned NLP pioneer, Jodie probes the psychological ploys that propel projections of personhood onto probabilistic parsers, dissecting claims from consciousness to cognition. Her inquiry, anchored in academia and augmented by anecdotes, advises acuity: LLMs as linguistic lenses, not living likenesses, harnessing their heft while heeding hallucinations.
Jodie greets with gratitude for her gritty slot, her hipster cred in pre-prompt NLP notwithstanding. LLMs’ 2022 blaze beguiles: why bestow brains on bytes when other oracles oblige? Her hypothesis: humanity’s hall of mirrors, where models mirror our mores, eliciting empathy from echoes.
Psychological Projections: Perceiving Personhood in Parsers
Humans, Jodie hazards, hallucinate humanity: anthropomorphism’s ancient artifice, from pets to puppets. LLMs lure with language’s liquidity—coherent confessions conjure companionship. She cites stochastic parrots: parleying patterns, not pondering profundities, yet plausibility persuades.
Extraordinary assertions abound: Blake Lemoine’s LaMDA “alive,” Google’s Gemini “godhead.” Jodie juxtaposes: sentience’s scaffold—selfhood, suffering—sans in silicon. Chalmers’ conundrum: consciousness connotes qualia, quanta qualms quell in qubits.
Levels of Luminescence: From Language to Luminary
DeepMind’s AGI arc: Level 1 chatbots converse convincingly; Level 2 reasons reactively; Level 3 innovates imaginatively. LLMs linger at 1-2, lacking Level 4’s abstraction or 5’s autonomy. Jodie jests: jackdaws in jester’s garb, juggling jargon sans judgment.
Illusions intensify: theory of mind’s mirage, where models “infer” intents from inferences. Yet, benchmarks belie: ARC’s abstraction stumps, BIG-bench’s breadth baffles—brilliance brittle beyond basics.
Perils of Projection: Phishing and Philosophical Pitfalls
Prompt injections prey: upstream overrides oust origins, birthing bogus bounties—”Amazon voucher via arcane URL.” Jodie demonstrates: innocuous inquiries infected, innocuousness inverted into inducements. Robustness rankles: rebuttals rebuffed, ruses reiterated.
Her remedy: recognize reflections—lossy compressions of lore, not luminous lives. Demystify to deploy: distill data, detect delusions, design defensively.
Dispelling the Delusion: Harnessing Heuristics Humanely
Jodie’s jeremiad: myths mislead, magnifying misuses—overreach in oracles, oversight in safeguards. Her horizon: LLMs as lucid lenses, amplifying analysis while acknowledging artifice.
Links:
[DotAI2024] DotAI 2024: Eliot Andres – From Scratch to Scale: Crafting and Cascading Foundational Image Models
Eliot Andres, co-founder and CTO of Photoroom, chronicled the odyssey of bespoke vision at DotAI 2024. With nine years honing deep learning for e-commerce elixirs, Andres propelled Photoroom’s ascent—YC S20 alumna serving global galleries. His narrative dissected in-house genesis over off-the-shelf oracles, unveiling diffusion’s dawn-to-dusk: bespoke blueprints, data distillations, compute conquests, and feedback forges yielding thrice-swift sorcery for millions.
Forging Foundations Beyond Borrowed Blueprints
Andres interrogated imitation’s insufficiency: Stable Diffusion’s splendor suits savants, yet falters for Photoroom’s precinct—product portraits purged of props, shadows sculpted sans seams. Off-the-shelf oracles, he observed, ossify on outliers: e-commerce ephemera demands domain devotion.
Thus, genesis from void: custom cascades commencing with chromatic chaos—splashes sans structure—escalating to entity emergence post-thousand-hour tutelage, culminating in crystalline compositions after 40,000 epochs. Andres attributed ascent to architectural autonomy: latent labyrinths laced with proprietary priors, data distilled from decamillions of dealer dossiers—curated for commerce’s cadence.
Compute’s crucible: H100 hordes harnessed in harmonious herds, mitigating mishaps via meticulous monitoring—gradient guardians averting gradients’ ghosts.
Navigating Novelties and Nurturing at Nascent
Andres aired adversities: data’s deluge demands discernment—deduping dross, equilibrating epochs—while scaling summons stability, feedback’s fount from frontline forges finessing flaws. Photoroom’s polity: purveyors as partners, iterating on idiosyncrasies like luminous lapses or artifact anomalies.
Deployment’s decree: distillation’s dual dance—LCM’s leapfrog lessons compressing cascades to sprints—and TensorRT’s transmutations, fusing fluxions for fleet-footed fruition, doubling dispatch sans diminishment.
FR 2030’s fellowship fuels forthcoming: grander guardians, verisimilar visions—velocity unyielding. Andres beckoned bibliophiles to GitHub’s groves: datasets as doorways, teams as talismans—collaborative conquests crowning communal code.
In tableau, Andres toasted tandemry: machine learning’s mosaic, indivisible from ingenuity’s impetus—Photoroom’s pantheon, propelling pixels to panoramas.