Jonathan Lalou's Blog

Posts Tagged ‘KotlinConf’

Lecturer

Amanda Hinchman-Dominguez, a Grinnell College ’17 alum, specializes in UI development for sales enablement. With experience at Prudential and Cisco, she is also a sculptor. Relevant links: TornadoFX GitHub (project); LinkedIn Profile (professional page).

Abstract

This article analyzes Amanda Hinchman-Dominguez’s exploration of Kotlin and TornadoFX for metaprogramming, addressing crosscutting concerns in software design. Contextualized in the limitations of Java’s OOP, it examines Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP) via TornadoFX’s type-safe builders. The analysis highlights innovations in UI automation and test generation, with implications for scalability and modularity.

Introduction and Context

At KotlinConf 2018, Amanda Hinchman-Dominguez presented her early research on Kotlin and TornadoFX, a JavaFX framework leveraging Kotlin’s features. Software complexity demands modular, scalable solutions, but Java’s OOP struggles with crosscutting concerns like logging or UI consistency. TornadoFX’s type-safe builders and Kotlin’s low-ceremony syntax offer a foundation for AOP and metaprogramming, set in the context of her work to automate UI development and testing.

Methodological Approaches to Metaprogramming

Hinchman-Dominguez used TornadoFX’s builders to create declarative UI code, reducing boilerplate. She experimented with metaprogramming to generate UI tests dynamically, collecting data to predict bugs or suggest designs. Her approach involved defining aspects (e.g., validation rules) to separate concerns, using Kotlin’s lambdas and extensions for fluent APIs. Examples included generating UI components and tests, leveraging TornadoFX’s community-driven development.

Analysis of Innovations and Features

TornadoFX innovates with type-safe, declarative UI construction, contrasting Java’s verbose reflection. Kotlin’s lambdas enable AOP-like separation, addressing crosscutting issues. Test generation predicts bugs, a step toward reinforcement learning. Compared to JavaFX alone, TornadoFX simplifies UI logic. Limitations include her project’s early stage and messy code, requiring community contributions for maturity.

Implications and Consequences

This approach implies automated, scalable UI development, reducing repetitive tasks. It could lead to data-driven design tools, enhancing productivity. Consequences include a steeper learning curve for AOP, but open-source collaboration mitigates this, fostering innovation in Kotlin’s ecosystem.

Conclusion

Hinchman-Dominguez’s work with TornadoFX showcases Kotlin’s potential for metaprogramming, paving the way for modular, automated software design with significant future impact.

Links

• Lecture video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyGvwsQ5W5A
• Lecturer’s X/Twitter: @amandahd
• Lecturer’s LinkedIn: Amanda Hinchman-Dominguez
• Organization’s X/Twitter: N/A (independent)
• Organization’s LinkedIn: N/A

Lecturer

Kevin Galligan is president of Touchlab, a mobile development firm. He organizes Droidcon NYC and the New York Android meetup, focusing on platform convergence. Relevant links: Touchlab Blog (publications); LinkedIn Profile (professional page).

Abstract

This article traces Kevin Galligan’s overview of Kotlin Multiplatform for Android and iOS. Set in the rise of multiplatform libraries, it examines shared architecture patterns, inspired by Google’s J2ObjC. The analysis highlights methodologies for repositories and concurrency, with implications for cross-platform consistency and library ecosystems.

Introduction and Context

Kevin Galligan addressed KotlinConf 2018, reflecting on 2016’s J2ObjC experiments. Kotlin Multiplatform, enabling shared Android-iOS logic, was poised for growth in 2018-2019. Galligan reviewed libraries, gaps, and resources, set against Touchlab’s mobile expertise and community engagement.

Methodological Approaches

Galligan proposed a shared repository pattern, using expect/actual for platform-specific database access. Concurrency used frozen objects for thread safety, with Android bypassing freezing. Libraries like SQLDelight and Ktor were highlighted, with coroutines noted as immature for Native.

Analysis of Innovations and Features

Multiplatform innovates code reuse, reducing duplication. Expect/actual abstracts platform differences. Compared to J2ObjC, Kotlin offers native compilation. Limitations include coroutine readiness and freezing complexity.

Implications and Consequences

Galligan’s vision implies unified mobile architectures, streamlining development. It fosters a growing library ecosystem.

Conclusion

Galligan’s insights herald Kotlin Multiplatform’s role in mobile convergence, urging library development.

Links

• Lecture video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dul17VSiejo
• Lecturer’s X/Twitter: @kevingalligan
• Lecturer’s LinkedIn: Kevin Galligan
• Organization’s X/Twitter: @touchlab
• Organization’s LinkedIn: Touchlab

Lecturer

Dr. Venkat Subramaniam is an award-winning author, founder of Agile Developer, Inc., and a professor at the University of Houston. He mentors developers globally and has authored books like Practices of an Agile Developer. Relevant links: Agile Developer Website (publications); LinkedIn Profile (professional page).

Abstract

This article delves into Venkat Subramaniam’s exploration of creating internal domain-specific languages (DSLs) in Kotlin. Set in the context of reducing code ceremony, it analyzes Kotlin’s features like infix notation and implicit receivers. Methodologies for fluent APIs and implications for domain-driven design are highlighted, emphasizing Kotlin’s suitability for expressive DSLs.

Introduction and Context

Venkat Subramaniam presented at KotlinConf 2018 on crafting internal DSLs, which offer concise, context-aware syntax for specific domains. Kotlin’s low-ceremony nature and behavioral injection make it ideal for DSLs, unlike Java’s rigidity. This narrative unfolds where developers seek to encapsulate domain logic fluently, enhancing readability and maintainability in agile projects.

Methodological Approaches to DSL Creation

Subramaniam began with DSL characteristics: fluency, conciseness, and implicit context. He used Kotlin’s infix functions for natural syntax (e.g., 1 plus 2). Lambda-with-receiver enabled context objects, allowing methods like left or right within a scope. Extension functions injected behavior, while lexical scoping resolved properties dynamically. Examples included a report DSL, where configurations were set declaratively, and a context-switching DSL for flexible execution.

Analysis of Innovations and Features

Kotlin’s infix notation innovates by mimicking natural language, reducing syntactic noise. Implicit receivers create intuitive contexts, unlike Java’s explicit calls. Extension functions enable seamless domain extensions. Compared to external DSLs, internal DSLs leverage Kotlin’s compiler safety. Limitations include working within Kotlin’s constraints, requiring careful design to avoid ambiguity.

Implications and Consequences

Subramaniam’s DSLs imply more readable domain code, aligning with business logic. They enhance maintainability in complex systems, though require upfront design effort. Consequences include broader adoption of Kotlin for domain-driven projects, with open-source examples fostering community contributions.

Conclusion

Subramaniam’s guide underscores Kotlin’s prowess for internal DSLs, offering a blueprint for fluent, maintainable domain code that elevates software design.

Links

• Lecture video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzTeAM8N1-o
• Lecturer’s X/Twitter: @venkat_s
• Lecturer’s LinkedIn: Venkat Subramaniam
• Organization’s X/Twitter: @AgileLearner
• Organization’s LinkedIn: Agile Developer

Lecturer

August Lilleaas is a full-stack developer and consultant in Oslo, working with SQL, Datomic, JVM, Clojure, and React. He leverages Kotlin for client projects. Relevant links: Personal Blog (publications); LinkedIn Profile (professional page).

Abstract

This article explores August Lilleaas’s introduction to Datomic, a unique database with single-threaded writes and client-side queries. Set in Kotlin-driven development, it examines Datomic’s time-travel and storage-agnostic design, inspired by BigTable and VoltDB. The analysis highlights its trade-offs, contextualized in data-intensive applications, with implications for history queries and scalability.

Introduction and Context

August Lilleaas presented Datomic at KotlinConf 2018, emphasizing its unconventional design. Unlike traditional databases, Datomic writes to external stores, runs queries client-side, and supports time-travel. Lilleaas, a Kotlin user, clarified his independence from Datomic’s creators. This narrative unfolds where developers seek flexible databases for Kotlin applications, leveraging its JVM compatibility.

Methodological Approaches to Datomic

Datomic’s writer is single-threaded, capping write throughput but simplifying consistency. It stores data in BigTable or other backends, with no native storage. Queries execute on clients, using indexes for efficiency. Time-travel allows historical queries, supporting “real updates” that preserve past states. Lilleaas demonstrated Kotlin queries, leveraging Datomic’s API.

Analysis of Innovations and Features

Datomic innovates with time-travel, enabling GDPR-like compliance. Client-side queries reduce server load, unlike SQL databases. Compared to MongoDB, Datomic’s structured API suits Kotlin’s type safety. Limitations include proprietary nature and write ceilings, mitigated by cloud offerings.

Implications and Consequences

Datomic implies flexible data modeling, ideal for history-sensitive apps. Its trade-offs suit read-heavy systems, enhancing Kotlin’s data layer.

Conclusion

Lilleaas’s advocacy reveals Datomic’s potential as a Kotlin-friendly database, balancing innovation with practical trade-offs.

Links

• Lecture video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hicQvxdKvnc
• Lecturer’s X/Twitter: @augustl
• Lecturer’s LinkedIn: August Lilleaas
• Organization’s X/Twitter: N/A (independent)
• Organization’s LinkedIn: N/A

Lecturer

Roman Elizarov is a seasoned software developer at JetBrains, with over 17 years of experience in high-performance trading software at Devexperts. An expert in Java and JVM, he teaches concurrent programming at St. Petersburg ITMO and serves as Chief Judge for the Northeastern European Regional Programming Contest. Relevant links: JetBrains Blog (publications); LinkedIn Profile (professional page).

Abstract

This article follows Roman Elizarov’s practical application of Kotlin coroutines to address concurrency challenges. Set in the context of large-scale systems, it examines methodologies for state confinement and communication via channels. The analysis highlights coroutines’ innovations in eliminating shared mutable state, with implications for robust, scalable architectures.

Introduction and Context

Roman Elizarov engaged KotlinConf 2018 attendees with a deep dive into coroutines, building on his prior introductory talk. With a vision for a unified language across distributed systems, Elizarov showcased coroutines as a solution to concurrency without shared mutable state. His examples addressed real-life coordination, set against his experience with high-throughput trading systems processing millions of events per second.

Methodological Approaches to Concurrency

Elizarov demonstrated coroutines confining state to single coroutines, communicating via channels. Each coroutine handles a specific task, receiving input and sending output through channels, avoiding locks. For UI integration, coroutines on the main thread directly update views or report via channels for decoupled architectures. Builders like launch and async orchestrate tasks, while suspend functions enable non-blocking code.

Analysis of Innovations and Features

Coroutines innovate by simplifying async programming. Channels provide fan-out communication, unlike threads’ shared state. Compared to Java’s CompletableFuture, coroutines preserve sequential code structure. Limitations include a learning curve for channel patterns and ensuring proper context management.

Implications and Consequences

Elizarov’s approach implies cleaner, safer concurrency models, reducing bugs in complex systems. It suits UI-driven apps and distributed systems, enhancing scalability. The consequence is a shift toward channel-based designs, though teams must master coroutine semantics.

Conclusion

Elizarov’s practical guide positions coroutines as a cornerstone for modern concurrency, offering a robust alternative to traditional threading models.

Links

• Lecture video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3agLJQ6vt8
• Lecturer’s X/Twitter: @relizarov
• Lecturer’s LinkedIn: Roman Elizarov
• Organization’s X/Twitter: @JetBrains
• Organization’s LinkedIn: JetBrains

Lecturer

Lisa Wray is a mobile developer and Google Developer Expert for Android, specializing in user interfaces. Holding a B.S. in music and computer science from M.I.T., she works at Present, a local social network, with prior roles at Google, The New York Times, and Genius. Relevant links: Present Website (professional page); LinkedIn Profile (professional page).

Abstract

This article delves into Lisa Wray’s exploration of Kotlin’s expressive potential, drawing parallels with literary principles from authors like William Zinsser and Stephen King. Contextualized in the transition from Java’s rigidity, it examines methodologies for balancing brevity, maintainability, and domain-specific languages (DSLs). The analysis highlights innovations in Kotlin’s syntax, implications for code quality, and the delicate balance of expressive freedom.

Introduction and Context

Lisa Wray captivated the KotlinConf 2018 audience with a unique perspective, likening Kotlin coding to writing a novel. Transitioning from Java’s prescriptive nature, Wray found Kotlin’s expressive freedom inspiring yet challenging. Her talk, inspired by literary works like On Writing Well and On Writing, navigates the question of how to wield Kotlin’s features—such as concise syntax and DSLs—without sacrificing clarity or maintainability. This narrative unfolds in a context where developers, liberated from Java’s boilerplate, seek guidelines beyond official style guides to craft robust, readable codebases.

Methodological Approaches to Expressive Coding

Wray proposed applying literary principles to coding. Clarity, akin to Zinsser’s advice, demands concise yet understandable code. She advocated selective use of Kotlin’s features: lambdas, extension functions, and optional syntax like type inference. For DSLs, she explored lambda-with-receiver constructs, where a builder class defines a custom interface, as seen in Kotlin’s apply or with. Her methodology emphasized restraint—using DSLs judiciously to avoid complexity. She cautioned against overusing custom DSLs, which add maintenance overhead, while endorsing well-crafted third-party DSLs that leverage Kotlin’s syntax.

Analysis of Innovations and Features

Kotlin’s innovations lie in its expressive syntax: lambdas reduce verbosity, and DSLs create domain-specific interfaces within Kotlin’s grammar. Compared to Java, Kotlin’s flexibility allows poetic code, but Wray warned of Perl-like obscurity. Her golden rule—avoid DSLs where named parameters suffice—curbs boilerplate. Third-party DSLs, when thoughtfully designed, enhance rather than pollute codebases, as they reuse Kotlin’s syntax. Limitations include the tediousness of crafting DSLs and the risk of over-concision, which may obscure intent.

Implications and Consequences

Wray’s approach implies a shift toward intentional coding, where developers weigh brevity against maintainability. It encourages teams to define project-specific style guides, fostering consistency in large codebases. The consequence is a codebase that balances expressiveness with clarity, aiding collaboration and longevity. However, over-reliance on DSLs could deter new developers, necessitating careful documentation.

Conclusion

Wray’s literary analogy reframes Kotlin coding as an art form, urging developers to harness its expressive power thoughtfully. By blending writing principles with technical restraint, she offers a path to crafting maintainable, impactful code—perhaps the next great Kotlin novel.

Links

• Lecture video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qokTPw5npMQ
• Lecturer’s X/Twitter: @lisawray
• Lecturer’s LinkedIn: Lisa Wray
• Organization’s X/Twitter: @presentco
• Organization’s LinkedIn: Present